GIF vs. ARMW

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

GIF (REX Growth & Income Universe ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

GIF vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GIF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 12,389.21%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -8.74%
• 1M: -26.57%
• 6M: 228.85%
• YTD: 228.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIF vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF	12,941.67%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	166.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GIF and ARMW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026	0.44

Return for Risk

GIF vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GIF vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIF drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIF and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIF	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-48.47%	+35.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-33.82%	+33.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-25.34%	+21.08%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GIF	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23,333.19%	94.35%	+23,238.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23,333.19%	94.35%	+23,238.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23,333.19%	94.35%	+23,238.84%

GIF vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GIF and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

GIF vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.48%, more than ARMW's 36.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	36.90%	16.38%
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF	109.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIF and ARMW in my portfolio?

GIF and ARMW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GIF or ARMW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIF or ARMW?

GIF and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIF or ARMW?

GIF has the higher dividend yield at 109.48%, compared with 36.90% for ARMW.

What is the main difference between GIF and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill Investments.