GIF vs. ARMW
GIF (REX Growth & Income Universe ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GIF vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GIF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- 6M
- 146.99%
- YTD
- 134.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.87M | $4.86M | $4.12M |
GIF vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF | 12,941.67% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 90.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIF and ARMW is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIF vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIF vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIF | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -56.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -52.71% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -27.18% | — |
Volatility
GIF vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIF | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 96.03% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 96.03% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 96.03% | — |
GIF vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GIF and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GIF vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.48%, more than ARMW's 62.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 62.70% | 16.38% |
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF | 109.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIF and ARMW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIF and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GIF has the higher dividend yield at 109.48%, compared with 62.70% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for GIF and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer