PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO).

Performance

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIB-A.TO
CGI Inc		-20.74%-19.04%10.91%21.63%4.35%10.75%-7.07%30.14%22.25%5.99%
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		10.47%23.93%14.24%4.76%-7.87%21.81%0.04%22.71%2.74%15.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIB-A.TO:

CA$21.83B

FTS.TO:

CA$39.60B

EPS

GIB-A.TO:

CA$7.51

FTS.TO:

CA$3.56

PE Ratio

GIB-A.TO:

13.36

FTS.TO:

21.94

PEG Ratio

GIB-A.TO:

1.67

FTS.TO:

3.19

PS Ratio

GIB-A.TO:

1.37

FTS.TO:

3.24

PB Ratio

GIB-A.TO:

2.20

FTS.TO:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIB-A.TO:

CA$16.21B

FTS.TO:

CA$12.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIB-A.TO:

CA$3.33B

FTS.TO:

CA$4.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIB-A.TO:

CA$3.01B

FTS.TO:

CA$5.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIB-A.TO achieves a -20.74% return, which is significantly lower than FTS.TO's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GIB-A.TO has underperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of 4.93%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.

GIB-A.TO

1D
-1.37%
1M
1.26%
YTD
-20.74%
6M
-19.74%
1Y
-30.08%
3Y*
-8.12%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
4.93%

FTS.TO

1D
0.73%
1M
0.21%
YTD
10.47%
6M
13.14%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CGI Inc

Fortis Inc.

Often compared with GIB-A.TO:
GIB-A.TO vs. CAP.PAGIB-A.TO vs. IBMGIB-A.TO vs. ATO.PAGIB-A.TO vs. CSU.TOGIB-A.TO vs. ATRL.TOGIB-A.TO vs. SPYGIB-A.TO vs. XIU.TO
Often compared with FTS.TO:
FTS.TO vs. CU.TOFTS.TO vs. EMA.TOFTS.TO vs. T.TOFTS.TO vs. H.TOFTS.TO vs. VDY.TOFTS.TO vs. BIP-UN.TOFTS.TO vs. TRP.TO

Return for Risk

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GIB-A.TO
GIB-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GIB-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIB-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIB-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GIB-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIB-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
FTS.TO
FTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GIB-A.TOFTS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.22

1.69

-2.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.65

2.46

-4.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.30

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

3.79

-4.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.66

7.88

-9.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIB-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the FTS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIB-A.TO and FTS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GIB-A.TOFTS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.22

1.69

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.83

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.65

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.65

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between GIB-A.TO and FTS.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison

GIB-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FTS.TO's 3.21% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIB-A.TO
CGI Inc		0.64%0.49%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTS.TO
Fortis Inc.		3.21%3.48%3.99%4.19%4.01%3.36%3.73%3.39%3.79%3.52%3.68%3.73%

Drawdowns

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIB-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than FTS.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB-A.TO and FTS.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GIB-A.TOFTS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.59%

-35.48%

-52.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.79%

-6.22%

-29.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.00%

-24.01%

-19.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.00%

-28.27%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.95%

-2.40%

-39.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-6.54%

-32.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.91%

2.99%

+14.92%

Volatility

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison

CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) at 4.39%. This indicates that GIB-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GIB-A.TOFTS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

4.39%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.31%

9.49%

+10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.66%

13.44%

+11.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

14.23%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

16.81%

+3.88%

Financials

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Fortis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
4.08B
3.08B
(GIB-A.TO) Total Revenue
(FTS.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

GIB-A.TO vs. FTS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CGI Inc and Fortis Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
16.0%
28.2%
Portfolio components
GIB-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 653.22M and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

FTS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a gross profit of 868.00M and revenue of 3.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

GIB-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 653.22M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

FTS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc. reported an operating income of 868.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.

GIB-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 442.00M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

FTS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortis Inc. reported a net income of 444.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.