PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GHYU.L is traded in USD, while HYSD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYSD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYU.L achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than HYSD.L's 1.91% return.


GHYU.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.24%
6M
0.77%
YTD
0.64%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*

HYSD.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.52%
6M
1.83%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GHYU.L
Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc
0.64%11.40%5.09%12.34%-0.89%
HYSD.L
iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.91%16.41%5.80%17.64%-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYU.L and HYSD.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.65

The correlation between GHYU.L and HYSD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYU.L
GHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSD.L
HYSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHYU.LHYSD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.89

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

2.30

+2.29

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the HYSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYU.L and HYSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -22.38%, which is greater than HYSD.L's maximum drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYU.L and HYSD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYU.LHYSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-20.02%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-6.47%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.67%

-9.26%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.59%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-3.24%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

2.49%

-1.48%

Volatility

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Global High Yield Sustainable Exposure UCITS ETF - Acc (GHYU.L) is 0.91%, while iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (HYSD.L) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that GHYU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYU.LHYSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

2.10%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.84%

6.56%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

8.56%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.41%

12.07%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.83%

12.07%

-3.24%

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HYSD.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Dividend Comparison

GHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GHYU.L and HYSD.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYSD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYSD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GHYU.L.

GHYU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while HYSD.L tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GHYU.L and 0.22% for HYSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYU.L and HYSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer