PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GHYS.L is traded in GBP, while HYFA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYFA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYS.L achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than HYFA.L's 1.03% return.


GHYS.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.62%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
4.09%

HYFA.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.32%
YTD
1.03%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYS.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
1.32%7.56%6.95%11.60%-9.89%3.60%2.71%11.10%-3.20%4.61%
HYFA.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
1.03%1.79%7.04%4.70%-3.59%6.51%5.77%8.16%0.51%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYS.L and HYFA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2016

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYS.L
GHYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HYFA.L
HYFA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYS.LHYFA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.51

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

5.12

+3.43

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYS.L and HYFA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYS.LHYFA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.41

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.41

+0.18

Drawdowns

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.15%, roughly equal to the maximum HYFA.L drawdown of -24.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYS.L and HYFA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYS.LHYFA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.15%

-24.29%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-5.67%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

-9.66%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-12.31%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.99%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-4.33%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.68%

-1.03%

Volatility

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) is 1.48%, while Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that GHYS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYFA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYS.LHYFA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.43%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.79%

6.17%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

7.45%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

9.13%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

10.64%

-3.49%

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HYFA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYS.L vs. HYFA.L - Dividend Comparison

GHYS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, less than HYFA.L's 6.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYS.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
5.73%5.68%5.78%5.36%4.41%3.78%4.08%5.03%4.89%4.58%4.91%5.65%
HYFA.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.57%6.57%7.05%6.73%5.78%4.63%5.86%6.08%6.19%5.46%1.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYS.L and HYFA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYFA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYFA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYS.L.

GHYS.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged), while HYFA.L tracks FTSE Time-Weighted US Fallen Angel Bond Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GHYS.L and 0.45% for HYFA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYS.L and HYFA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer