PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GHYS.L is traded in GBP, while FAHY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FAHY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYS.L achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than FAHY.L's 0.89% return.


GHYS.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.62%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
4.09%

FAHY.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.71%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYS.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
1.32%7.56%6.95%11.60%-9.89%3.60%2.71%11.10%-3.20%4.61%
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
0.89%2.08%6.93%4.14%-3.51%6.81%5.36%9.22%0.08%-0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYS.L and FAHY.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2016

0.20

The correlation between GHYS.L and FAHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYS.L
GHYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FAHY.L
FAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYS.LFAHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.23

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

5.82

+2.73

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYS.L and FAHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYS.LFAHY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.54

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.45

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.44

+0.15

Drawdowns

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.15%, which is greater than FAHY.L's maximum drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYS.L and FAHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYS.LFAHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.15%

-23.91%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-3.99%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.54%

-9.89%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-11.66%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.91%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-4.15%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.53%

-0.88%

Volatility

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYS.LFAHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.51%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.79%

4.22%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

5.78%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

8.27%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

9.96%

-2.81%

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FAHY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYS.L vs. FAHY.L - Dividend Comparison

GHYS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, less than FAHY.L's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%6.61%6.89%6.85%5.66%4.54%6.26%6.22%6.01%5.63%1.23%0.00%
GHYS.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
5.73%5.68%5.78%5.36%4.41%3.78%4.08%5.03%4.89%4.58%4.91%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYS.L and FAHY.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FAHY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FAHY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYS.L.

GHYS.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged), while FAHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GHYS.L and 0.45% for FAHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYS.L and FAHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer