GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L
GHYS.L (iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GHYS.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged), while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GHYS.L returned 4.09%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSP1.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHYS.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GHYS.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYS.L achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, GHYS.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 4.09%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.
GHYS.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYS.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 1.32% | 7.56% | 6.95% | 11.60% | -9.89% | 3.60% | 2.71% | 11.10% | -3.20% | 4.61% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYS.L and CSP1.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2013 | 0.42 |
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GHYS.L
CSP1.L
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
GHYS.L
CSP1.L
Real Estate
GHYS.L
CSP1.L
Basic Materials
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Communication Services
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Consumer Cyclical
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Consumer Defensive
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Energy
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Financial Services
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Healthcare
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Industrials
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Technology
GHYS.L
-
CSP1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
GHYS.L
CSP1.L
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.51 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 4.07 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.55 | 14.99 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 2.73 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.04 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.03 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.09 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.15%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYS.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.15% | -25.48% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -7.12% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.54% | -20.77% | +16.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.70% | -20.77% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.15% | -25.48% | +0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.24% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -3.32% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 1.94% | -1.29% |
Volatility
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) is 1.48%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that GHYS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYS.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 2.62% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.79% | 7.16% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 10.62% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 14.31% | -8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 15.57% | -8.42% |
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYS.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
GHYS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GHYS.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 5.73% | 5.68% | 5.78% | 5.36% | 4.41% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 5.03% | 4.89% | 4.58% | 4.91% | 5.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHYS.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYS.L.
GHYS.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. GHYS.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged), while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GHYS.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for GHYS.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer