GHYG vs. XHYE
GHYG (iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF) and XHYE (BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - GHYG tracks the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index while XHYE tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GHYG returned 8.95%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for XHYE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GHYG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHYE.
Performance
GHYG vs. XHYE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYG achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than XHYE's 3.57% return.
GHYG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
XHYE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYG vs. XHYE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.58% | 11.28% | 5.85% | 13.29% | -8.13% |
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF | 3.57% | 6.73% | 7.46% | 11.49% | -1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYG and XHYE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GHYG and XHYE has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GHYG vs. XHYE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GHYG
XHYE
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
GHYG
XHYE
-
Real Estate
GHYG
XHYE
-
Basic Materials
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Communication Services
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Consumer Cyclical
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Consumer Defensive
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Energy
GHYG
-
XHYE
Financial Services
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Healthcare
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Industrials
GHYG
-
XHYE
-
Technology
GHYG
-
XHYE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYG vs. XHYE — Risk / Return Rank
GHYG
XHYE
GHYG vs. XHYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYG | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.69 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 8.50 | -6.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 26.98 | -20.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYG | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 3.18 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.84 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
GHYG vs. XHYE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYG drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than XHYE's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG and XHYE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYG | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -8.87% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.84% | -1.21% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.46% | -6.40% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.36% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -1.42% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.38% | +0.65% |
Volatility
GHYG vs. XHYE - Volatility Comparison
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) at 0.56%. This indicates that GHYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYG | XHYE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 0.56% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 1.98% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 3.24% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 7.60% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 7.60% | +1.17% |
GHYG vs. XHYE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XHYE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYG vs. XHYE - Dividend Comparison
GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than XHYE's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 6.24% | 6.03% | 6.11% | 5.60% | 4.64% | 4.57% | 4.36% | 4.61% | 5.62% | 4.60% | 4.61% | 4.79% |
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF | 5.79% | 6.55% | 7.04% | 6.46% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHYG and XHYE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHYG has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to XHYE (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYG dropped -27.36% vs XHYE's -8.87%.
On 3-year performance, GHYG leads with 8.95% vs 8.50% for XHYE. On fees, XHYE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHYE has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GHYG has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XHYE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GHYG.
GHYG has the higher dividend yield at 6.24%, compared with 5.79% for XHYE.
GHYG tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while XHYE tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GHYG and 0.35% for XHYE.
XHYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHYG and XHYE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer