PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYB vs. JPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYB vs. JPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYB achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than JPHY's 2.89% return.


GHYB

1D
0.21%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.38%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.52%

JPHY

1D
0.40%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.23%
YTD
2.89%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$535.22K$424.29K$572.41K
$1.19M$1.04M$1.51M

GHYB vs. JPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GHYB and JPHY is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.86

The correlation between GHYB and JPHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYB vs. JPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GHYB
GHYB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JPHY
JPHY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GHYB vs. JPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHYBJPHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.70

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

16.22

-7.07

GHYB vs. JPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the JPHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYB and JPHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHYB vs. JPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYB drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, which is greater than JPHY's maximum drawdown of -1.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYB and JPHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYBJPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-1.65%

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-1.65%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-0.22%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.38%

+0.22%

Volatility

GHYB vs. JPHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) is 0.73%, while JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY) has a volatility of 0.80%. This indicates that GHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYBJPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.80%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

2.40%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49%

3.05%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.69%

2.95%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

2.95%

+5.26%

GHYB vs. JPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than JPHY's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYB vs. JPHY - Dividend Comparison

GHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than JPHY's 6.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.72%7.00%6.65%6.20%5.67%4.46%4.75%5.57%5.68%1.45%
JPHY
JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF
6.38%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYB and JPHY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPHY has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to GHYB (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYB dropped -21.48% vs JPHY's -1.65%.

On 1-year performance, JPHY leads with 6.07% vs 5.45% for GHYB. On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPHY has performed better with a 6.07% return vs 5.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for GHYB.

GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 6.38% for JPHY.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GHYB and 0.24% for JPHY.

JPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYB and JPHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer