GHH.L vs. MNY.TO
GHH.L (Gooch & Housego plc) is a stock, while MNY.TO (Purpose Cash Management Fund) is Money Market fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Over the past 3 years, GHH.L returned 22.48%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MNY.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GHH.L is traded in GBp, while MNY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MNY.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHH.L achieves a 61.22% return, which is significantly higher than MNY.TO's 0.03% return.
GHH.L
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 61.22%
- 6M
- 64.51%
- 1Y
- 88.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- -5.35%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
MNY.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 2.01%
- 3Y*
- 0.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHH.L Gooch & Housego plc | 61.22% | 18.95% | -10.84% | 13.03% | -8.81% |
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 0.03% | 0.28% | -1.90% | 2.05% | -5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHH.L and MNY.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GHH.L
MNY.TO
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gooch & Housego plc (GHH.L) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHH.L | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.06 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 0.64 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 1.33 | +7.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHH.L | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.34 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.22 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHH.L drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHH.L and MNY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHH.L | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -12.07% | -82.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.21% | -2.82% | -23.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.22% | -6.35% | -36.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.05% | -8.78% | -34.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.46% | -8.86% | -32.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.40% | 1.36% | +9.04% |
Volatility
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Gooch & Housego plc (GHH.L) has a higher volatility of 23.48% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that GHH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHH.L | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.48% | 1.68% | +21.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.29% | 3.87% | +34.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.12% | 5.38% | +42.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.91% | 6.80% | +36.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.06% | 6.80% | +34.26% |
Dividends
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison
GHH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than MNY.TO's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHH.L Gooch & Housego plc | 1.38% | 2.20% | 2.53% | 2.13% | 2.30% | 0.37% | 0.61% | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.25% | 0.90% | 0.93% |
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 2.56% | 2.93% | 4.71% | 4.85% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHH.L and MNY.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GHH.L and MNY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer