PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHH.L vs. MNY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Gooch & Housego plc (GHH.L) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GHH.L is traded in GBp, while MNY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MNY.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHH.L achieves a 61.22% return, which is significantly higher than MNY.TO's 0.03% return.


GHH.L

1D
3.69%
1M
2.80%
YTD
61.22%
6M
64.51%
1Y
88.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
-5.35%
10Y*
1.84%

MNY.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
0.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GHH.L
Gooch & Housego plc
61.22%18.95%-10.84%13.03%-8.81%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
0.03%0.28%-1.90%2.05%-5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GHH.L and MNY.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHH.L
GHH.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GHH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GHH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MNY.TO
MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gooch & Housego plc (GHH.L) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHH.LMNY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.06

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

0.64

+3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

1.33

+7.90

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHH.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHH.L and MNY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHH.LMNY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

0.34

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.22

+0.38

Drawdowns

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHH.L drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHH.L and MNY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHH.LMNY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.10%

-12.07%

-82.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.21%

-2.82%

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.22%

-6.35%

-36.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.05%

-8.78%

-34.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.46%

-8.86%

-32.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.40%

1.36%

+9.04%

Volatility

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Gooch & Housego plc (GHH.L) has a higher volatility of 23.48% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that GHH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHH.LMNY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.48%

1.68%

+21.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.29%

3.87%

+34.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.12%

5.38%

+42.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.91%

6.80%

+36.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.06%

6.80%

+34.26%

Dividends

GHH.L vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

GHH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than MNY.TO's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHH.L
Gooch & Housego plc
1.38%2.20%2.53%2.13%2.30%0.37%0.61%0.82%0.90%0.25%0.90%0.93%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
2.56%2.93%4.71%4.85%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHH.L and MNY.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHH.L and MNY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer