PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

GGUS.AX (Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF) and BBOZ.AX (BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGUS.AX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BetaShares, while BBOZ.AX is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index. GGUS.AX is actively managed, while BBOZ.AX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GGUS.AX returned 20.86%/yr vs -20.81%/yr for BBOZ.AX. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) and BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF (BBOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS.AX achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly higher than BBOZ.AX's -3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GGUS.AX has outperformed BBOZ.AX with an annualized return of 20.86%, while BBOZ.AX has yielded a comparatively lower -20.81% annualized return.

GGUS.AX

1D
-2.97%
1M
-2.35%
6M
12.93%
YTD
15.21%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
29.41%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
20.86%

BBOZ.AX

1D
1.17%
1M
5.33%
6M
0.89%
YTD
-3.84%
1Y
-5.77%
3Y*
-14.11%
5Y*
-13.81%
10Y*
-20.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGUS.AX
Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF		15.21%18.83%45.64%49.70%-47.20%68.07%17.37%70.51%-21.12%45.08%
BBOZ.AX
BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF		-3.84%-16.29%-11.97%-19.36%-9.57%-33.33%-35.36%-40.20%8.71%-20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS.AX and BBOZ.AX is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015

-0.63

The correlation between GGUS.AX and BBOZ.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.69 (5 years) to -0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF

BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF

Often compared with GGUS.AX:
GGUS.AX vs. DHHF.AXGGUS.AX vs. EX20.AXGGUS.AX vs. F100.AXGGUS.AX vs. FOOD.AXGGUS.AX vs. FUEL.AXGGUS.AX vs. GEAR.AXGGUS.AX vs. GNDQ.AX
Often compared with BBOZ.AX:
BBOZ.AX vs. A200.AXBBOZ.AX vs. ARMR.AXBBOZ.AX vs. DHHF.AXBBOZ.AX vs. EX20.AXBBOZ.AX vs. FOOD.AXBBOZ.AX vs. FUEL.AXBBOZ.AX vs. GEAR.AX

Return for Risk

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGUS.AX
GGUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
BBOZ.AX
BBOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BBOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BBOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) and BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF (BBOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GGUS.AXBBOZ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.17
-0.20

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.67
-0.10

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.99

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

-0.32

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

-0.65

+7.54

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the BBOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS.AX and BBOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS.AX drawdown since its inception was -64.26%, smaller than the maximum BBOZ.AX drawdown of -93.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS.AX and BBOZ.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGUS.AXBBOZ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.26%

-93.82%

+29.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.90%

-17.56%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.78%

-50.45%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.53%

-61.95%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.26%

-91.76%

+27.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-93.27%

+88.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-67.88%

+54.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

8.69%

-3.44%

Volatility

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF (BBOZ.AX) at 5.12%. This indicates that GGUS.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGUS.AXBBOZ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

5.12%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

22.92%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

27.56%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.72%

30.12%

+11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.74%

33.41%

+7.33%

Dividends

GGUS.AX vs. BBOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGUS.AX nor BBOZ.AX has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBOZ.AX
BetaShares Australian Equities Strong Bear Complex ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.95%
GGUS.AX
Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF		0.00%1.69%0.00%0.00%6.12%2.52%0.00%0.12%0.96%0.62%0.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGUS.AX and BBOZ.AX have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGUS.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while BBOZ.AX is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGUS.AX and BBOZ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer