PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGSIX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGSIX achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than GSINX's 6.39% return.


GGSIX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.93%
YTD
10.48%
6M
11.32%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
11.36%

GSINX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGSIX
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio
10.48%19.29%19.26%17.83%-16.86%17.04%14.34%24.92%-10.65%20.64%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.39%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GGSIX and GSINX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GGSIX and GSINX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGSIX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGSIX
GGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGSIXGSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.55

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

5.17

+8.31

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGSIX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGSIXGSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.25

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.63

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.81

-0.34

Drawdowns

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.85%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGSIX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGSIXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.85%

-28.80%

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-7.80%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-10.32%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.74%

-25.46%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.72%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-4.85%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.33%

-0.38%

Volatility

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 2.75%. This indicates that GGSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGSIXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.75%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

7.89%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

9.68%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

14.37%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

15.69%

-1.36%

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGSIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGSIX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

GGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%, more than GSINX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGSIX
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio
10.75%11.87%12.21%1.73%5.76%6.57%3.47%5.77%3.02%2.77%1.35%2.03%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGSIX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGSIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to GSINX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGSIX dropped -52.85% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

GGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGSIX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer