GGSIX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GGSIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | -4.20% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 21.54% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGSIX achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GGSIX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
GGSIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGSIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGSIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GGSIX
GSIFX
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGSIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.60 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.91 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.12 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.81 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 3.23 | +1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGSIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.60 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.32 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.48 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.30 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGSIX and GSIFX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 12.39% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.85%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGSIX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGSIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.85% | -59.25% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -12.15% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.74% | -31.94% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.36% | -35.00% | +4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -11.48% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -15.30% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.06% | -0.55% |
Volatility
GGSIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) is 4.54%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GGSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGSIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 6.71% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 11.13% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 16.87% | -3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 16.71% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 17.32% | -3.05% |