GGSIX vs. FFACX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GGSIX (Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio) and FFACX (Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GGSIX returned 11.36%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for FFACX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGSIX charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for FFACX.

Performance

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGSIX achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than FFACX's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GGSIX has outperformed FFACX with an annualized return of 11.36%, while FFACX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.77% annualized return.

GGSIX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 25.82%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

FFACX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 6.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio	10.48%	19.29%	19.26%	17.83%	-16.86%	17.04%	14.34%	24.92%	-10.65%	21.54%
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C	7.94%	15.09%	12.06%	11.99%	-12.43%	10.89%	0.71%	16.90%	-10.54%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GGSIX and FFACX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2003	0.91

The correlation between GGSIX and FFACX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGSIX vs. FFACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGSIX

GGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
GGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
GGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FFACX

FFACX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FFACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FFACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FFACX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FFACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FFACX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGSIX	FFACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.22	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.18	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.42	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.82	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.48	12.57	+0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FFACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGSIX and FFACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGSIX	FFACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.22	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.74	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.59	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.47	0.00

Drawdowns

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.85%, roughly equal to the maximum FFACX drawdown of -53.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGSIX and FFACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGSIX	FFACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.85%	-53.66%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-6.75%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.78%	-10.99%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.74%	-18.76%	-7.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.36%	-30.23%	-0.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.20%	-7.97%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.51%	+0.44%

Volatility

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) at 2.58%. This indicates that GGSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGSIX	FFACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	2.58%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.69%	7.03%	+1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.93%	8.58%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.43%	10.01%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.33%	11.47%	+2.86%

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGSIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FFACX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGSIX vs. FFACX - Dividend Comparison

GGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%, more than FFACX's 4.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C	4.19%	4.52%	0.39%	0.90%	3.57%	0.45%	6.72%	2.24%	2.38%	2.21%	1.48%	2.17%
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio	10.75%	11.87%	12.21%	1.73%	5.76%	6.57%	3.47%	5.77%	3.02%	2.77%	1.35%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGSIX and FFACX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GGSIX and FFACX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GGSIX or FFACX?

GGSIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to FFACX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGSIX dropped -52.85% vs FFACX's -53.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.