PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGOV.L is traded in GBp, while FTFX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTFX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGOV.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than FTFX.L's 7.88% return.


GGOV.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.86%
6M
-1.39%
YTD
-1.84%
1Y
-1.37%
3Y*
-0.65%
5Y*
-3.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.68%

FTFX.L

1D
0.82%
1M
1.15%
6M
7.19%
YTD
7.88%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£645.68£1.16K£13.67K
£875.53£7.65K£5.65K

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGOV.L
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies
-1.84%-1.23%-1.81%-1.94%-7.40%-5.52%5.72%2.06%4.53%-0.86%
FTFX.L
First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
7.88%0.44%9.81%4.47%10.62%-2.51%-2.61%0.21%6.04%-2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GGOV.L and FTFX.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.34

The correlation between GGOV.L and FTFX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGOV.L
GGOV.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FTFX.L
FTFX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FTFX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGOV.LFTFX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.22

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

2.57

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

6.93

-7.23

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the FTFX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGOV.L and FTFX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGOV.L drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than FTFX.L's maximum drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV.L and FTFX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGOV.LFTFX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-15.71%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-4.14%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-11.41%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-12.32%

-12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.50%

0.00%

-25.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.44%

-6.06%

-10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.54%

+1.24%

Volatility

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) is 1.47%, while First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that GGOV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTFX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGOV.LFTFX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.36%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

6.69%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.81%

8.91%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

10.79%

+8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

10.08%

+5.51%

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGOV.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FTFX.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGOV.L vs. FTFX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGOV.L nor FTFX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GGOV.L and FTFX.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGOV.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGOV.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTFX.L.

GGOV.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while FTFX.L is Currency. GGOV.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while FTFX.L tracks Bloomberg G10 Carry Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GGOV.L and 0.75% for FTFX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGOV.L and FTFX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer