PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGOV.L achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than EGOV.L's -1.00% return.


GGOV.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.47%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-1.86%
1Y
0.56%
3Y*
-1.19%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*

EGOV.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.63%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
0.57%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-1.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GGOV.L
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies
-1.07%-1.06%-1.97%-1.94%-7.40%-5.91%6.13%-2.91%
EGOV.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
-1.00%0.21%-2.55%-1.25%-7.09%-5.75%5.54%-1.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GGOV.L and EGOV.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.66

Over the past year, GGOV.L and EGOV.L have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.66, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGOV.L
GGOV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

EGOV.L
EGOV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EGOV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGOV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGOV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EGOV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGOV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGOV.LEGOV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.03

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

0.15

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

0.30

-0.07

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGOV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is comparable to the EGOV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGOV.L and EGOV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGOV.LEGOV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.15

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

-0.24

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.52

-0.25

-0.27

Drawdowns

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGOV.L drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, roughly equal to the maximum EGOV.L drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV.L and EGOV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGOV.LEGOV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-25.11%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.67%

-4.49%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.70%

-5.55%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

-16.45%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-22.88%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-16.58%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.23%

+0.22%

Volatility

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies (GGOV.L) is 1.30%, while UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EGOV.L) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that GGOV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGOV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGOV.LEGOV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.38%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

3.31%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

4.51%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.20%

8.13%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

8.77%

+0.42%

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGOV.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EGOV.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GGOV.L vs. EGOV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGOV.L nor EGOV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GGOV.L and EGOV.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GGOV.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGOV.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EGOV.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GGOV.L and 0.15% for EGOV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGOV.L and EGOV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer