PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGLS vs. TSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGLS vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGLS achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -4.27% return.


GGLS

1D
0.70%
1M
6.67%
YTD
-14.40%
6M
-12.57%
1Y
-55.43%
3Y*
-31.29%
5Y*
10Y*

TSDD

1D
0.14%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
-7.92%
1Y
-62.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGLS vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares
-14.40%-42.64%-26.50%-7.16%
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
-4.27%-74.84%-89.21%-20.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GGLS and TSDD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGLS vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGLS
GGLS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDD
TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGLS vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGLSTSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.63

0.90

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.83

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.05

-0.30

GGLS vs. TSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGLS Sharpe Ratio is -1.91, which is lower than the TSDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGLS and TSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGLSTSDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.91

-0.68

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.95

-0.66

-0.29

Drawdowns

GGLS vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.24%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLS and TSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGLSTSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.24%

-99.03%

+17.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.43%

-76.12%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.97%

-98.90%

+19.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.86%

-71.21%

+24.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.18%

59.88%

-18.70%

Volatility

GGLS vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) is 8.19%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 24.19%. This indicates that GGLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGLSTSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

24.19%

-16.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

54.90%

-33.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.17%

92.57%

-63.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.27%

114.46%

-83.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.27%

114.46%

-83.19%

GGLS vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGLS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGLS vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison

GGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than TSDD's 8.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares
4.93%4.87%4.31%5.80%0.20%
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
8.80%8.42%0.00%24.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGLS and TSDD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to GGLS (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLS dropped -81.24% vs TSDD's -99.03%.

On 1-year performance, GGLS leads with -55.43% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, GGLS is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, GGLS has been the lower-risk option at 8.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GGLS has performed better with a -55.43% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GGLS is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 4.93% for GGLS.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for GGLS and 1.50% for TSDD.

TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGLS and TSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer