GGLS vs. SHRT
GGLS (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. GGLS is passively managed, while SHRT is actively managed. Over the past year, GGLS returned -55.43% vs -21.72% for SHRT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GGLS charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
GGLS vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGLS achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly higher than SHRT's -17.20% return.
GGLS
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.67%
- YTD
- -14.40%
- 6M
- -12.57%
- 1Y
- -55.43%
- 3Y*
- -31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- -17.20%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -21.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGLS vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | -14.40% | -42.64% | -26.50% | -6.25% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -17.20% | -0.91% | -1.44% | -5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGLS and SHRT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGLS vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
GGLS
SHRT
GGLS vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGLS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.63 | 0.74 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.96 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -2.09 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGLS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.91 | -1.67 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.95 | -0.79 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
GGLS vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.24%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -25.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLS and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGLS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.24% | -25.98% | -55.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.43% | -22.73% | -37.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.97% | -25.74% | -53.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.86% | -8.12% | -38.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.18% | 10.40% | +30.78% |
Volatility
GGLS vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 4.29%. This indicates that GGLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGLS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 4.29% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 10.96% | +10.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.17% | 13.04% | +16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 12.78% | +18.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 12.78% | +18.49% |
GGLS vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGLS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGLS vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
GGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than SHRT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | 4.93% | 4.87% | 4.31% | 5.80% | 0.20% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGLS and SHRT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGLS has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to SHRT (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLS dropped -81.24% vs SHRT's -25.98%.
On 1-year performance, SHRT leads with -21.72% vs -55.43% for GGLS. On fees, GGLS is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHRT has performed better with a -21.72% return vs -55.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GGLS is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
GGLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.08% for SHRT.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for GGLS and 1.35% for SHRT.
SHRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.67 vs -1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGLS and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer