PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGLS vs. GOOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGLS vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGLS achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly lower than GOOX's 18.83% return.


GGLS

1D
0.70%
1M
6.67%
YTD
-14.40%
6M
-12.57%
1Y
-55.43%
3Y*
-31.29%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-13.31%
YTD
18.83%
6M
12.03%
1Y
274.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGLS vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares
-14.40%-42.64%-25.32%
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
18.83%121.41%46.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GGLS and GOOX is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

-0.99

The correlation between GGLS and GOOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGLS vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGLS
GGLS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOX
GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGLS vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGLSGOOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.63

1.58

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

7.10

-8.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

24.06

-25.41

GGLS vs. GOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGLS Sharpe Ratio is -1.91, which is lower than the GOOX Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGLS and GOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGLSGOOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.91

4.83

-6.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.95

1.27

-2.22

Drawdowns

GGLS vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.24%, which is greater than GOOX's maximum drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLS and GOOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGLSGOOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.24%

-52.46%

-28.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.43%

-38.98%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.97%

-21.02%

-57.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.86%

-17.04%

-29.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.18%

11.48%

+29.70%

Volatility

GGLS vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) is 8.19%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 16.21%. This indicates that GGLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGLSGOOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

16.21%

-8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

40.03%

-18.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.17%

57.42%

-28.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.27%

60.37%

-29.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.27%

60.37%

-29.10%

GGLS vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGLS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGLS vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison

GGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than GOOX's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares
4.93%4.87%4.31%5.80%0.20%
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
0.26%0.30%16.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGLS and GOOX have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOX has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to GGLS (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLS dropped -81.24% vs GOOX's -52.46%.

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 274.80% vs -55.43% for GGLS. On fees, GOOX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, GGLS has been the lower-risk option at 8.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 274.80% return vs -55.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for GGLS.

GGLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.26% for GOOX.

GGLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for GGLS and 1.05% for GOOX.

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs -1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGLS and GOOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer