GGBFX vs. DAIOX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX).
GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. DAIOX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Oct 31, 2013.
Performance
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
DAIOX Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund | -0.72% | 5.68% | 5.33% | 12.18% | -14.11% | -2.18% | 3.85% | 3.82% | -5.00% | 9.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBFX achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than DAIOX's -0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBFX has outperformed DAIOX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while DAIOX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.90% annualized return.
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
DAIOX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBFX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than DAIOX's 1.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBFX vs. DAIOX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBFX
DAIOX
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBFX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.50 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.05 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.87 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 7.90 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBFX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.50 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.29 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.15 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.03 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBFX and DAIOX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Dividend Comparison
GGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than DAIOX's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
DAIOX Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund | 3.90% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 4.56% | 7.17% | 2.88% | 2.23% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.11% | 1.10% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBFX drawdown since its inception was -27.03%, roughly equal to the maximum DAIOX drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBFX and DAIOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBFX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.03% | -27.58% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -2.58% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -24.80% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.97% | -24.96% | +3.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -2.58% | -2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -9.34% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.61% | +0.33% |
Volatility
GGBFX vs. DAIOX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) have volatilities of 1.76% and 1.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBFX | DAIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 1.68% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 2.20% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.26% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 4.59% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.49% | 5.94% | -1.45% |