GFGF vs. TEXN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GFGF is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. Over the past year, GFGF returned 8.97% vs 30.05% for TEXN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFGF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.

Performance

GFGF vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 20.05% return.

GFGF

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: -1.94%
• 6M: -2.37%
• 1Y: 8.97%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TEXN

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -2.29%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 6M: 18.60%
• 1Y: 30.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFGF vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	-1.94%	11.12%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	20.05%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and TEXN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.40

GFGF vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GFGF	TEXN
Technology	36.0%	20.6%
Financial Services	30.1%	3.9%
Healthcare	14.1%	2.7%
Communication Services	10.9%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	2.1%
Industrials	2.4%	16.3%
Real Estate	2.0%	3.9%
Basic Materials	-	0.7%
Energy	-	32.3%
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

GFGF vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFGF

GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 19
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 19

TEXN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGF vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFGF	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.01	—	—

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and TEXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFGF	TEXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.98%	-6.34%	-21.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.22%	-6.34%	-8.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-4.90%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-1.24%	-6.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFGF	TEXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	14.50%	-1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	14.50%	+4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	14.50%	+4.55%

GFGF vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFGF vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TEXN's 1.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	0.22%	0.21%	0.10%	0.08%	0.42%	0.01%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.40%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFGF and TEXN in my portfolio?

GFGF and TEXN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GFGF or TEXN?

On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 30.05% vs 8.97% for GFGF. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GFGF or TEXN?

Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 30.05% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFGF or TEXN?

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GFGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFGF or TEXN?

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.22% for GFGF.

What is the main difference between GFGF and TEXN?

They also come from different issuers: GuruFocus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GFGF and 0.20% for TEXN.