GFGF vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
GFGF and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFGF is an actively managed fund by GuruFocus. It was launched on Dec 15, 2021. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFGF or MOAT.
Correlation
The correlation between GFGF and MOAT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GFGF vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GFGF:
1.77
MOAT:
0.84
GFGF:
2.44
MOAT:
1.21
GFGF:
1.32
MOAT:
1.15
GFGF:
2.81
MOAT:
1.47
GFGF:
11.10
MOAT:
3.48
GFGF:
2.27%
MOAT:
2.79%
GFGF:
14.23%
MOAT:
11.55%
GFGF:
-27.99%
MOAT:
-33.31%
GFGF:
-1.04%
MOAT:
-5.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.20% return.
GFGF
4.01%
0.82%
11.64%
24.07%
N/A
N/A
MOAT
-1.20%
-2.66%
0.66%
8.07%
11.59%
13.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFGF vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFGF vs. MOAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GFGF
MOAT
GFGF vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFGF vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than MOAT's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.42% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.38% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.45% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
GFGF vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.99%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFGF vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.14%. This indicates that GFGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.