PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFGF vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFGF vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFGF vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
-10.95%13.11%26.12%24.03%-20.32%2.13%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
-5.92%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a -10.95% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's -5.92% return.


GFGF

1D
2.53%
1M
-6.53%
YTD
-10.95%
6M
-6.60%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
10Y*

GVIP

1D
4.35%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-4.60%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFGF vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GFGF vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFGF
GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGF vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFGFGVIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.04

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.42

1.55

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

1.76

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.07

6.94

-5.88

GFGF vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFGF and GVIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFGFGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.04

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.71

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and GVIP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GFGF vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than GVIP's 0.36% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
0.24%0.21%0.10%0.08%0.42%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.36%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and GVIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFGFGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-37.09%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-13.67%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.71%

-9.91%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-7.71%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.47%

+0.58%

Volatility

GFGF vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is 5.03%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that GFGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFGFGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

8.62%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

14.52%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

23.32%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

21.19%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

21.68%

-2.35%