PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFGF vs. GURU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFGF vs. GURU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFGF vs. GURU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
-10.38%13.11%26.12%24.03%-20.32%2.13%
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
-4.73%25.43%23.76%19.28%-27.94%3.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a -10.38% return, which is significantly lower than GURU's -4.73% return.


GFGF

1D
0.63%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-10.38%
6M
-6.17%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
10Y*

GURU

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
-4.73%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFGF vs. GURU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GURU's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GFGF vs. GURU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFGF
GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GURU
GURU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGF vs. GURU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFGFGURUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.10

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

1.64

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

1.64

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.99

6.33

-5.34

GFGF vs. GURU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the GURU Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFGF and GURU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFGFGURUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.10

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.60

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and GURU is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GFGF vs. GURU - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than GURU's 0.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFGF
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
0.24%0.21%0.10%0.08%0.42%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
0.12%0.11%0.17%0.57%0.22%0.09%2.75%0.35%0.54%0.54%0.22%0.47%

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. GURU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, smaller than the maximum GURU drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and GURU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFGFGURUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-38.50%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-13.33%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.15%

-7.19%

-4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-8.75%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.45%

+0.67%

Volatility

GFGF vs. GURU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is 5.05%, while Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that GFGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GURU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFGFGURUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

6.75%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

11.71%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

20.27%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

20.27%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

20.08%

-0.76%