GFACX vs. GXXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C (GFACX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX).
GFACX is a passively managed fund by American Funds that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Mar 15, 2001. GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFACX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C | -8.23% | 18.80% | 27.01% | 36.20% | -31.28% | 18.41% | 36.84% | 27.20% | -3.93% | 25.13% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -7.53% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFACX achieves a -8.23% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's -7.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GFACX having a 13.45% annualized return and GXXIX not far behind at 13.33%.
GFACX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -8.23%
- 6M
- -7.53%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
GXXIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFACX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFACX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
GFACX
GXXIX
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C (GFACX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFACX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.19 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 0.40 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.05 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 0.31 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 1.15 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFACX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.19 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.56 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFACX and GXXIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
GFACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%, more than GXXIX's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFACX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C | 13.54% | 12.43% | 10.01% | 7.82% | 4.22% | 9.11% | 4.48% | 7.03% | 12.28% | 7.04% | 6.43% | 8.73% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.48% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFACX drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFACX and GXXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFACX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -33.65% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -11.78% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.81% | -33.65% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.81% | -33.65% | -3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.84% | -10.87% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -6.20% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 3.14% | +0.54% |
Volatility
GFACX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C (GFACX) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 5.20%. This indicates that GFACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFACX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 5.20% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 9.27% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.02% | 16.73% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 27.78% | -7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 23.72% | -4.08% |