GFACX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C (GFACX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
GFACX is a passively managed fund by American Funds that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Mar 15, 2001. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFACX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C | -11.38% | 18.80% | 27.01% | 36.20% | -31.28% | 18.41% | 36.84% | 27.20% | -3.93% | 25.13% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFACX achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GFACX having a 13.05% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 13.23%.
GFACX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -10.24%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFACX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFACX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
GFACX
FSKAX
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C (GFACX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFACX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.83 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 1.04 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 5.05 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFACX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.83 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.59 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.78 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFACX and FSKAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
GFACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFACX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C | 14.02% | 12.43% | 10.01% | 7.82% | 4.22% | 9.11% | 4.48% | 7.03% | 12.28% | 7.04% | 6.43% | 8.73% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFACX drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFACX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFACX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -35.01% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -12.42% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.81% | -25.39% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.81% | -35.01% | -1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -8.92% | -4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -4.05% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 2.57% | +1.04% |
Volatility
GFACX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Fund Class C (GFACX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that GFACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFACX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 4.42% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 9.40% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 18.50% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 17.38% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 18.42% | +1.19% |