PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEVG vs. QUBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEVG vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEVG achieves a 88.18% return, which is significantly higher than QUBX's -25.88% return.


GEVG

1D
-2.09%
1M
-22.22%
YTD
88.18%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QUBX

1D
-16.53%
1M
20.88%
YTD
-25.88%
6M
-51.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEVG vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GEVG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF
88.18%-11.09%
QUBX
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF
-25.88%-20.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GEVG and QUBX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEVG vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GEVG vs. QUBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEVGQUBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

-0.44

+2.61

Drawdowns

GEVG vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEVG drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, smaller than the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEVG and QUBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEVGQUBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-96.40%

+62.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.62%

-91.00%

+58.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-69.71%

+60.46%

Volatility

GEVG vs. QUBX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEVGQUBXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.61%

200.76%

-104.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.61%

200.76%

-104.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.61%

200.76%

-104.15%

GEVG vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEVG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QUBX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEVG vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEVG nor QUBX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GEVG and QUBX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

GEVG and QUBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEVG and 1.30% for QUBX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEVG and QUBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer