GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE
GERD.DE (L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GERD.DE tracks the Solactive Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity while WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GERD.DE returned 26.06% vs 28.36% for WRLD.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GERD.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for WRLD.DE.
Performance
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GERD.DE achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.
GERD.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GERD.DE L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.41% | 10.26% | 18.54% | 7.85% |
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 18.45% | 11.71% | 1.59% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GERD.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between GERD.DE and WRLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GERD.DE
WRLD.DE
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (GERD.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GERD.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.57 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 11.33 | +4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GERD.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 1.91 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.38 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERD.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.22%, smaller than the maximum WRLD.DE drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERD.DE and WRLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERD.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.22% | -23.55% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.61% | -7.90% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.38% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -9.51% | +7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.50% | -0.81% |
Volatility
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (GERD.DE) is 3.18%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that GERD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERD.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 4.50% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 11.34% | -2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 14.81% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 16.98% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 16.98% | -4.03% |
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERD.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERD.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GERD.DE nor WRLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GERD.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GERD.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GERD.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
GERD.DE tracks Solactive Gerd Kommer Multifactor Equity, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GERD.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for GERD.DE and WRLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer