PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEQYX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund (GEQYX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEQYX achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GEQYX having a 15.08% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 15.09%.


GEQYX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.67%
YTD
11.42%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.08%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEQYX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund
11.42%17.06%24.88%26.52%-19.91%28.26%18.14%31.68%-4.48%21.97%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GEQYX and FSKAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.98

The correlation between GEQYX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEQYX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEQYX
GEQYX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GEQYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund (GEQYX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEQYXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.38

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

15.52

-0.31

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEQYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEQYX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEQYXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.46

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.76

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.85

-0.50

Drawdowns

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEQYX drawdown since its inception was -58.95%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEQYX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEQYXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.95%

-35.01%

-23.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.92%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-19.43%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-25.39%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

-35.01%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.84%

-4.02%

-7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.94%

-0.04%

Volatility

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund (GEQYX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEQYXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.97%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

9.23%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

12.26%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

17.41%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

18.46%

-0.33%

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEQYX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GEQYX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

GEQYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
GEQYX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund
1.38%1.54%3.82%3.95%1.27%3.29%2.35%2.26%2.08%2.18%1.58%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GEQYX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to GEQYX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEQYX dropped -58.95% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEQYX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer