PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEND.L vs. SBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS (GEND.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GEND.L is traded in GBP, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEND.L achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than SBUY.L's 6.48% return.


GEND.L

1D
0.63%
1M
1.94%
YTD
3.88%
6M
5.71%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*

SBUY.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.68%
YTD
6.48%
6M
8.35%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GEND.L
Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS
3.88%14.61%9.03%10.71%-5.64%17.68%6.53%21.77%0.11%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
6.48%21.60%14.64%9.46%-0.90%21.36%8.43%25.36%-6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GEND.L and SBUY.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.86

The correlation between GEND.L and SBUY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GEND.L
SBUY.L

Financial Services

22.5%
32.9%

Healthcare

15.2%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
1.9%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.1%

Utilities

7.0%
2.2%

Industrials

6.9%
11.0%

Technology

6.2%
7.6%

Real Estate

5.2%
0.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.4%

Energy

-

17.1%

Financial Services

GEND.L
22.5%
SBUY.L
32.9%

Healthcare

GEND.L
15.2%
SBUY.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GEND.L
12.0%
SBUY.L
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

GEND.L
10.5%
SBUY.L
1.9%

Communication Services

GEND.L
9.9%
SBUY.L
4.1%

Utilities

GEND.L
7.0%
SBUY.L
2.2%

Industrials

GEND.L
6.9%
SBUY.L
11.0%

Technology

GEND.L
6.2%
SBUY.L
7.6%

Real Estate

GEND.L
5.2%
SBUY.L
0.5%

Basic Materials

GEND.L
4.7%
SBUY.L
1.4%

Energy

GEND.L

-

SBUY.L
17.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEND.L
GEND.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GEND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GEND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS (GEND.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEND.LSBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

5.25

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

16.93

-9.99

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEND.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEND.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEND.LSBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.57

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.80

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.84

-0.20

Drawdowns

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEND.L drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND.L and SBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEND.LSBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-30.91%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-4.79%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-17.76%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

-17.76%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

0.00%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-3.99%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.49%

+0.84%

Volatility

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS (GEND.L) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that GEND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEND.LSBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.32%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

7.04%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

9.81%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

13.73%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

15.51%

-1.20%

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEND.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEND.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

GEND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEND.L
Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEND.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEND.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEND.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GEND.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEND.L and SBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer