PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEMIX vs. GMAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEMIX achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 44.54% return.


GEMIX

1D
-5.64%
1M
2.46%
YTD
27.26%
6M
28.23%
1Y
50.17%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
10.66%

GMAQX

1D
-5.77%
1M
0.70%
YTD
44.54%
6M
46.95%
1Y
69.93%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GEMIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund
27.26%32.84%9.10%6.63%-30.01%-5.82%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
44.54%32.09%0.62%27.41%-32.38%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GEMIX and GMAQX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021

0.82

The correlation between GEMIX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEMIX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEMIX
GEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAQX
GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEMIXGMAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.65

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

5.41

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.94

19.05

-4.12

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEMIX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.46%, which is greater than GMAQX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMIX and GMAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMIXGMAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.46%

-41.97%

-26.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.65%

-13.77%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.46%

-19.64%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-8.50%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-16.60%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

3.90%

-0.23%

Volatility

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) have volatilities of 13.16% and 12.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMIXGMAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.16%

12.79%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.68%

21.88%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

23.71%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

17.90%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

17.90%

+0.52%

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEMIX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

GEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than GMAQX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEMIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.61%0.78%1.09%1.33%0.22%0.95%0.31%1.09%0.79%0.88%1.09%0.10%
GMAQX
GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
6.52%9.43%32.28%6.76%4.94%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEMIX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEMIX has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to GMAQX (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEMIX dropped -68.46% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEMIX and GMAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer