GEL vs. XOM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).

Performance

GEL vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GEL vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P.	13.36%	61.77%	-8.37%	19.90%	1.05%	84.99%	-66.17%	22.60%	-9.18%	-32.37%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	34.50%	15.98%	11.26%	-6.26%	87.41%	57.58%	-36.21%	7.23%	-15.09%	-3.81%

Fundamentals

EPS GEL : -$3.48 XOM : $10.37
PS Ratio GEL : 1.31 XOM : 1.42
Total Revenue (TTM) GEL : $1.63B XOM : $327.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) GEL : $238.99M XOM : $81.32B
EBITDA (TTM) GEL : $385.55M XOM : $61.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEL achieves a 13.36% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GEL has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 1.78%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.

GEL

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 13.36%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 15.51%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: 19.37%
• 10Y*: 1.78%

XOM

• 1D: -5.23%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 34.50%
• 6M: 45.79%
• 1Y: 39.70%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 27.68%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GEL vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEL

GEL Risk / Return Rank: 55
GEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GEL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GEL Martin Ratio Rank: 62

XOM

XOM Risk / Return Rank: 81
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEL vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GEL	XOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	1.57	-1.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	2.04	-1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.27	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	2.48	-1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	6.44	-4.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEL vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEL Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEL and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GEL	XOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	1.57	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	1.05	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.42	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.48	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between GEL and XOM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GEL vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

GEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than XOM's 2.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P.	3.86%	4.23%	6.08%	5.18%	5.88%	5.60%	16.10%	10.74%	11.37%	11.87%	7.54%	6.72%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	2.51%	3.32%	3.57%	3.68%	3.22%	5.70%	8.44%	4.92%	4.74%	3.66%	3.30%	3.69%

Drawdowns

GEL vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEL drawdown since its inception was -91.63%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEL and XOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEL	XOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.63%	-62.40%	-29.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.68%	-15.79%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.79%	-20.51%	-18.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.61%	-61.34%	-28.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.26%	-6.23%	-23.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.15%	-10.20%	-23.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.13%	6.18%	+0.95%

Volatility

GEL vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) is 5.07%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that GEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEL	XOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	8.47%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.55%	17.04%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.31%	25.43%	+7.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.70%	26.57%	+15.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.25%	27.93%	+23.32%

Financials

GEL vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genesis Energy, L.P. and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 440.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.20B and revenue of 83.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.

GEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported an operating income of 89.91M and revenue of 440.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 9.81B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

GEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a net income of 34.41M and revenue of 440.76M, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 7.61B and revenue of 83.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.