GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX
GEAR.AX (Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF) and ESGI.AX (VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GEAR.AX is actively managed, while ESGI.AX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GEAR.AX returned 8.25%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for ESGI.AX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEAR.AX achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than ESGI.AX's 6.43% return.
GEAR.AX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
ESGI.AX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 8.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEAR.AX Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF | 1.29% | 15.80% | 13.80% | 15.84% | -9.50% | 36.03% | -11.97% | 52.03% | -11.34% |
ESGI.AX VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF | 6.43% | 6.29% | 23.14% | 16.95% | -7.32% | 24.77% | 4.97% | 28.97% | -2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEAR.AX and ESGI.AX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GEAR.AX and ESGI.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX — Risk / Return Rank
GEAR.AX
ESGI.AX
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF (GEAR.AX) and VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF (ESGI.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEAR.AX | ESGI.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.12 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 1.38 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEAR.AX drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than ESGI.AX's maximum drawdown of -22.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEAR.AX and ESGI.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEAR.AX | ESGI.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.50% | -22.88% | -43.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.82% | -14.92% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.91% | -14.92% | -15.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.27% | -19.38% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.41% | -1.00% | -7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -4.51% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.40% | 6.53% | +1.87% |
Volatility
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Volatility Comparison
Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF (GEAR.AX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF (ESGI.AX) at 3.61%. This indicates that GEAR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGI.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEAR.AX | ESGI.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 3.61% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.27% | 12.18% | +9.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.91% | 14.33% | +11.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.72% | 13.00% | +16.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 13.86% | +19.05% |
Dividends
GEAR.AX vs. ESGI.AX - Dividend Comparison
GEAR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than ESGI.AX's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGI.AX VanEck MSCI International Sustainable Equity ETF | 2.71% | 6.43% | 6.58% | 3.35% | 2.39% | 1.42% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GEAR.AX Betashares Geared Australian Equities Complex ETF | 0.57% | 1.39% | 0.26% | 0.92% | 8.66% | 3.72% | 5.62% | 6.55% | 2.90% | 1.64% | 1.57% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEAR.AX and ESGI.AX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for GEAR.AX and ESGI.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer