PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF (GDXD.TO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 -2x Daily Bear ETF (QQD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXD.TO achieves a -18.91% return, which is significantly higher than QQD.TO's -32.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXD.TO has underperformed QQD.TO with an annualized return of -47.44%, while QQD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher -43.50% annualized return.


GDXD.TO

1D
1.07%
1M
26.07%
YTD
-18.91%
6M
-17.03%
1Y
-78.68%
3Y*
-67.32%
5Y*
-52.75%
10Y*
-47.44%

QQD.TO

1D
-3.58%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-32.75%
6M
-31.73%
1Y
-45.33%
3Y*
-38.44%
5Y*
-31.14%
10Y*
-43.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDXD.TO
BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF
-18.91%-89.27%-51.09%-14.78%-30.72%-3.72%-84.19%-59.16%-6.06%-13.59%
QQD.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 -2x Daily Bear ETF
-32.75%-36.36%-34.56%-56.98%69.96%-45.18%-84.74%-50.55%-10.33%-45.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXD.TO and QQD.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2008

0.13

The correlation between GDXD.TO and QQD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (10 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXD.TO
GDXD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GDXD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

QQD.TO
QQD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
QQD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
QQD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF (GDXD.TO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 -2x Daily Bear ETF (QQD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXD.TOQQD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.78

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

-0.99

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-1.99

+0.84

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXD.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is higher than the QQD.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXD.TO and QQD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum QQD.TO drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD.TO and QQD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXD.TOQQD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.99%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.59%

-45.99%

-41.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.32%

-80.24%

-18.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.83%

-89.01%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.95%

-99.67%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-99.99%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-92.21%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.90%

22.85%

+46.05%

Volatility

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF (GDXD.TO) has a higher volatility of 32.35% compared to BetaPro NASDAQ-100 -2x Daily Bear ETF (QQD.TO) at 19.06%. This indicates that GDXD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXD.TOQQD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.35%

19.06%

+13.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.48%

29.66%

+43.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.70%

36.04%

+55.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.11%

45.60%

+22.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.76%

47.82%

+20.94%

Dividends

GDXD.TO vs. QQD.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDXD.TO nor QQD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXD.TO and QQD.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXD.TO and QQD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer