GDLC vs. YBTC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC).

GDLC and YBTC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDLC is a passively managed fund by Grayscale that tracks the performance of the CoinDesk 5 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018. YBTC is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jan 17, 2024.

Performance

GDLC vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GDLC vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-24.52%	0.45%	195.12%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-18.34%	-4.23%	58.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -18.34% return.

GDLC

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: -24.52%
• 6M: -44.20%
• 1Y: -10.19%
• 3Y*: 65.34%
• 5Y*: -3.20%
• 10Y*: —

YBTC

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 6.07%
• YTD: -18.34%
• 6M: -38.39%
• 1Y: -14.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDLC vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.

YBTC

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

GDLC

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF

Return for Risk

GDLC vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 10
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 9

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 7
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDLC vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	-0.36	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	-0.25	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.97	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	-0.32	+0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	-0.72	+0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDLC vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDLC and YBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	-0.36	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.25	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and YBTC is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GDLC vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.43%.

	TTM	2025	2024
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	85.43%	76.04%	44.53%

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and YBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.14%	-47.09%	-47.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.91%	-47.09%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.45%	-40.36%	-11.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.90%	-11.04%	-41.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.86%	20.83%	+4.03%

Volatility

GDLC vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 9.23%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.67%	9.23%	+4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.43%	34.14%	+6.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.42%	40.09%	+10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.87%	41.60%	+36.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.02%	41.60%	+53.42%