GDLC vs. YBTC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. GDLC is passively managed, while YBTC is actively managed. Over the past year, GDLC returned -42.29% vs -39.52% for YBTC. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YBTC.

Performance

GDLC vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -30.16% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.08% return.

GDLC

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.19%
• 6M: -19.67%
• YTD: -30.16%
• 1Y: -42.29%
• 3Y*: 49.03%
• 5Y*: -3.08%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.89%

YBTC

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 4.67%
• 6M: -14.64%
• YTD: -23.08%
• 1Y: -39.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	$1.36M	$1.40M	$1.44M
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	$1.48M	$1.24M	$1.57M

GDLC vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-30.16%	0.45%	184.31%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-23.08%	-4.23%	55.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and YBTC is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	0.83

The correlation between GDLC and YBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GDLC vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 3
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDLC vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	-0.99	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	-1.38	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.83	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.81	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	-1.26	+0.14

GDLC vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is comparable to the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDLC and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -48.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and YBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.14%	-48.84%	-45.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.18%	-48.84%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.07%	-43.83%	-11.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.83%	-14.95%	-37.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.88%	31.47%	+6.41%

Volatility

GDLC vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 7.36%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDLC	YBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	7.36%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.61%	31.73%	+3.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.03%	40.20%	+8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.69%	40.43%	+31.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.49%	40.43%	+53.06%

GDLC vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDLC vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	80.06%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDLC and YBTC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GDLC and YBTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GDLC or YBTC?

GDLC has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to YBTC (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs YBTC's -48.84%.

Which ETF is better, GDLC or YBTC?

On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -39.52% vs -42.29% for GDLC. On fees, GDLC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDLC or YBTC?

Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -39.52% return vs -42.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDLC or YBTC?

GDLC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDLC or YBTC?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 80.06%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.

What is the main difference between GDLC and YBTC?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.95% for YBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.