GDIIX vs. YAFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDIIX (Genter Dividend Income Fund) and YAFFX (AMG Yacktman Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GDIIX returned 11.50%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for YAFFX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.25% expense ratio.

Performance

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Dividend Income Fund (GDIIX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIIX achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 30.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GDIIX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.

GDIIX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 24.63%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

YAFFX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 30.77%
• 6M: 14.70%
• 1Y: 28.89%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 12.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GDIIX Genter Dividend Income Fund	11.60%	16.34%	16.24%	5.64%	-1.16%	24.81%	-0.78%	27.62%	-8.45%	18.33%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	30.77%	3.89%	9.30%	16.53%	-8.20%	16.48%	17.22%	19.21%	2.99%	20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIIX and YAFFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between GDIIX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GDIIX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIIX

GDIIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
GDIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GDIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GDIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GDIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GDIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

YAFFX

YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 25
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Dividend Income Fund (GDIIX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDIIX	YAFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	1.32	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	1.46	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	1.71	+2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.16	6.17	+7.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIIX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDIIX	YAFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	1.32	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.58	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.78	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.62	+0.06

Drawdowns

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIIX drawdown since its inception was -37.24%, smaller than the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIIX and YAFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDIIX	YAFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.24%	-43.80%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-17.08%	+10.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.50%	-18.88%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.88%	-21.31%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.24%	-30.62%	-6.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-0.48%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-6.21%	+2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	4.70%	-2.90%

Volatility

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genter Dividend Income Fund (GDIIX) is 2.52%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that GDIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDIIX	YAFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	6.13%	-3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	22.29%	-14.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.23%	22.19%	-11.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	18.10%	-4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	16.53%	+0.02%

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDIIX and YAFFX have an expense ratio of 1.25%.

Dividends

GDIIX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

GDIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDIIX Genter Dividend Income Fund	4.21%	4.79%	9.73%	2.66%	5.24%	4.07%	2.27%	8.01%	13.52%	10.01%	4.47%	1.89%
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund	0.00%	0.00%	18.44%	4.42%	7.60%	4.70%	11.87%	15.84%	22.15%	11.82%	11.81%	24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDIIX and YAFFX in my portfolio?

GDIIX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDIIX or YAFFX?

YAFFX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to GDIIX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDIIX dropped -37.24% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.