GDIG.L vs. UC90.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L).
GDIG.L and UC90.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDIG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. UC90.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. Both GDIG.L and UC90.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDIG.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 16.01% | 90.59% | -8.68% | 4.57% | 3.63% | 7.14% | 31.37% | 25.35% | -14.38% |
UC90.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 14.19% | 17.85% | 2.78% | 3.15% | 2.58% | 32.01% | 1.77% | 10.16% | -20.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
GDIG.L is traded in USD, while UC90.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC90.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDIG.L achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly higher than UC90.L's 14.19% return.
GDIG.L
- 1D
- 6.60%
- 1M
- -11.75%
- YTD
- 16.01%
- 6M
- 34.46%
- 1Y
- 98.90%
- 3Y*
- 27.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- —
UC90.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 18.21%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UC90.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L — Risk / Return Rank
GDIG.L
UC90.L
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDIG.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.84 | 1.47 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.19 | 2.02 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.27 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 2.42 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.96 | 8.17 | +8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDIG.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 1.47 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.21 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDIG.L and UC90.L is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDIG.L nor UC90.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDIG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.03%, smaller than the maximum UC90.L drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIG.L and UC90.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDIG.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.03% | -41.45% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.08% | -9.65% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.03% | -19.19% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.40% | -1.39% | -11.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -13.36% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 2.22% | +3.71% |
Volatility
GDIG.L vs. UC90.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a higher volatility of 15.29% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) at 4.77%. This indicates that GDIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC90.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDIG.L | UC90.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.29% | 4.77% | +10.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 10.80% | +18.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.70% | 15.90% | +18.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.92% | 18.73% | +12.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.74% | 18.80% | +10.94% |