GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDIG.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and NGAS.L (WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDIG.L is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while NGAS.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDIG.L returned 14.63%/yr vs -25.67%/yr for NGAS.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDIG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NGAS.L.

Performance

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIG.L achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly higher than NGAS.L's -11.49% return.

GDIG.L

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 17.71%
• 6M: 26.04%
• 1Y: 86.92%
• 3Y*: 30.04%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: —

NGAS.L

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: -11.49%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -36.85%
• 3Y*: -25.66%
• 5Y*: -25.67%
• 10Y*: -23.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GDIG.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF	17.71%	90.59%	-8.68%	4.57%	3.63%	7.14%	31.37%	25.35%	-14.38%
NGAS.L WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF	-11.49%	-24.72%	-26.18%	-65.28%	20.27%	25.42%	-43.27%	-40.74%	11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIG.L and NGAS.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018	0.04

The correlation between GDIG.L and NGAS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDIG.L	NGAS.L
Basic Materials	93.9%	100.0%
Energy	4.3%	-
Industrials	1.0%	-
Technology	0.8%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIG.L

GDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

NGAS.L

NGAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
NGAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NGAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NGAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NGAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NGAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDIG.L	NGAS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	-0.66	+3.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	-0.75	+3.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.91	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	-0.77	+4.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	-1.11	+12.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the NGAS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIG.L and NGAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDIG.L	NGAS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	-0.66	+3.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	-0.44	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	-0.59	+1.13

Drawdowns

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.03%, smaller than the maximum NGAS.L drawdown of -99.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIG.L and NGAS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDIG.L	NGAS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.03%	-99.91%	+59.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.08%	-47.73%	+23.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.08%	-70.31%	+46.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.03%	-93.13%	+53.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.12%	-99.91%	+88.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.71%	-89.09%	+76.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.39%	33.25%	-25.86%

Volatility

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) at 11.19%. This indicates that GDIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NGAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDIG.L	NGAS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.50%	11.19%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.02%	47.23%	-18.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.78%	55.38%	-20.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.31%	59.00%	-27.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.93%	50.65%	-20.72%

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NGAS.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDIG.L vs. NGAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDIG.L nor NGAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDIG.L and NGAS.L in my portfolio?

GDIG.L and NGAS.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDIG.L or NGAS.L?

On fees, NGAS.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDIG.L or NGAS.L?

NGAS.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIG.L.

What is the main difference between GDIG.L and NGAS.L?

GDIG.L is categorized as Materials, while NGAS.L is Commodities. GDIG.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while NGAS.L tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIG.L and 0.49% for NGAS.L.