PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ERNX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GDIG.L is traded in USD, while ERNX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ERNX.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIG.L achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than ERNX.DE's -2.39% return.


GDIG.L

1D
0.93%
1M
-11.17%
YTD
3.53%
6M
0.82%
1Y
64.43%
3Y*
25.51%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*

ERNX.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.76%
1Y
-0.38%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GDIG.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
3.53%90.59%-8.69%4.58%-6.00%
ERNX.DE
iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating
-2.39%16.04%-1.89%6.45%1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIG.L and ERNX.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIG.L
GDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNX.DE
ERNX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ERNX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ERNX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDIG.LERNX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.00

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

-0.07

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

-0.17

+7.67

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the ERNX.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIG.L and ERNX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.03%, which is greater than ERNX.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIG.L and ERNX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDIG.LERNX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.03%

-11.36%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.08%

-5.02%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-7.52%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.83%

-4.93%

-16.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-2.55%

-10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

2.19%

+6.38%

Volatility

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a higher volatility of 14.46% compared to iShares Euro Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (ERNX.DE) at 1.68%. This indicates that GDIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDIG.LERNX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.46%

1.68%

+12.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.48%

4.57%

+26.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.10%

6.40%

+30.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.73%

7.92%

+23.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.42%

7.92%

+22.50%

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNX.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDIG.L vs. ERNX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDIG.L nor ERNX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GDIG.L and ERNX.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNX.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNX.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIG.L.

GDIG.L is categorized as Materials, while ERNX.DE is Ultrashort Bond. GDIG.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while ERNX.DE tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIG.L and 0.09% for ERNX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDIG.L and ERNX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer