PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and Global X Disruptive Materials UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DMAD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GDIG.L is traded in USD, while DMAD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DMAD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIG.L achieves a -2.57% return, which is significantly higher than DMAD.L's -5.73% return.


GDIG.L

1D
-2.00%
1M
-17.87%
6M
-13.29%
YTD
-2.57%
1Y
48.61%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*

DMAD.L

1D
-2.40%
1M
-19.00%
6M
-16.47%
YTD
-5.73%
1Y
48.49%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GDIG.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
-2.57%90.59%-8.69%4.58%14.07%
DMAD.L
Global X Disruptive Materials UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-5.73%97.09%-7.49%-19.94%-8.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIG.L and DMAD.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.79

The correlation between GDIG.L and DMAD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIG.L
GDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAD.L
DMAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DMAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) and Global X Disruptive Materials UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DMAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDIG.LDMAD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.69

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

4.59

+0.08

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the DMAD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIG.L and DMAD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.03%, smaller than the maximum DMAD.L drawdown of -44.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIG.L and DMAD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDIG.LDMAD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.03%

-44.00%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.29%

-28.54%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-34.28%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.43%

-28.54%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

-21.48%

+8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

10.54%

-0.16%

Volatility

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to Global X Disruptive Materials UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DMAD.L) at 10.04%. This indicates that GDIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDIG.LDMAD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.13%

10.04%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.79%

29.66%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.90%

36.20%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.91%

31.42%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.49%

31.42%

-0.93%

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDIG.L and DMAD.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

GDIG.L vs. DMAD.L - Dividend Comparison

GDIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DMAD.L
Global X Disruptive Materials UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.90%0.74%2.38%1.32%
GDIG.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDIG.L and DMAD.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDIG.L and DMAD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GDIG.L is categorized as Materials, while DMAD.L is Commodity Producers Equities. GDIG.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while DMAD.L tracks Solactive Disruptive Materials V2 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDIG.L and DMAD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer