PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDE vs. QQUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDE vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDE achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly higher than QQUP's -5.71% return.


GDE

1D
-2.89%
1M
-12.63%
YTD
-3.38%
6M
-7.83%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
39.47%
5Y*
10Y*

QQUP

1D
-1.88%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-8.46%
1Y
31.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDE vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDE and QQUP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.51

The correlation between GDE and QQUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDE vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDE vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDEQQUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

0.85

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

2.36

+1.82

GDE vs. QQUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the QQUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDE and QQUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDE vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum QQUP drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and QQUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDEQQUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-37.67%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.66%

-37.67%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.82%

-22.94%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-9.54%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.23%

13.53%

-5.30%

Volatility

GDE vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) is 11.66%, while ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that GDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDEQQUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.66%

14.05%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.64%

30.57%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.45%

40.06%

-9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.18%

39.76%

-12.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.18%

39.76%

-12.58%

GDE vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDE vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison

GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than QQUP's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.47%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.51%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDE and QQUP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQUP has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to GDE (11.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDE dropped -32.01% vs QQUP's -37.67%.

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 34.32% vs 31.81% for QQUP. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 11.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 34.32% return vs 31.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 0.51% for QQUP.

GDE is categorized as Gold, while QQUP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GDE and 0.95% for QQUP.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDE and QQUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer