GDE vs. QQUP
GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) and QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QQUP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%). GDE is actively managed, while QQUP is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QQUP.
Performance
GDE vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDE achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than QQUP's 14.50% return.
GDE
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 53.13%
- 3Y*
- 46.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQUP
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDE vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 9.79% | 37.01% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 14.50% | 44.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDE and QQUP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDE vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank
GDE
QQUP
GDE vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDE | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDE | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.77 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
GDE vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum QQUP drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and QQUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDE | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -37.67% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.17% | -6.42% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -9.20% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | — | — |
Volatility
GDE vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDE | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.39% | 38.52% | -10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 38.52% | -12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 38.52% | -12.40% |
GDE vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDE vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison
GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than QQUP's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 3.94% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDE and QQUP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.
GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 0.42% for QQUP.
GDE is categorized as Gold, while QQUP is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GDE and 0.95% for QQUP.
Find the right allocation for GDE and QQUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer