GDE vs. IBKR
GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) is Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GDE returned 42.64%/yr vs 67.33%/yr for IBKR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDE vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDE achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 41.50% return.
GDE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 40.98%
- 3Y*
- 42.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBKR
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 41.50%
- 6M
- 41.85%
- 1Y
- 80.51%
- 3Y*
- 67.33%
- 5Y*
- 41.64%
- 10Y*
- 26.54%
GDE vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 3.16% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -8.58% |
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 41.50% | 46.37% | 114.43% | 15.14% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDE and IBKR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | 0.32 |
The correlation between GDE and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDE vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank
GDE
IBKR
GDE vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDE | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.20 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 10.65 | -5.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDE vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum IBKR drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and IBKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDE | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -63.66% | +31.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | -18.70% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -38.66% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.53% | 0.00% | -16.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -24.85% | +16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 7.35% | +0.38% |
Volatility
GDE vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) have volatilities of 10.77% and 11.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDE | IBKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 11.31% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.97% | 27.82% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.88% | 37.67% | -7.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.09% | 34.50% | -7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.09% | 33.37% | -6.28% |
Dividends
GDE vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison
GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than IBKR's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.19% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDE and IBKR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBKR has higher volatility (11.31%) compared to GDE (10.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDE dropped -32.01% vs IBKR's -63.66%.
IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDE and IBKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer