PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GD vs. SOBO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GD is traded in USD, while SOBO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SOBO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than SOBO.TO's 40.32% return.


GD

1D
0.38%
1M
5.52%
YTD
7.93%
6M
7.67%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
12.38%

SOBO.TO

1D
0.96%
1M
5.83%
YTD
40.32%
6M
44.41%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
7.93%30.39%-13.10%
SOBO.TO
South Bow Corp
40.32%25.61%15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GD and SOBO.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GD:

$98.74B

SOBO.TO:

CA$11.12B

EPS

GD:

$15.92

SOBO.TO:

$2.03

PE Ratio

GD:

22.63

SOBO.TO:

18.81

PEG Ratio

GD:

2.86

SOBO.TO:

3.47

PS Ratio

GD:

1.83

SOBO.TO:

4.37

PB Ratio

GD:

3.79

SOBO.TO:

2.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

GD:

$53.81B

SOBO.TO:

$1.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GD:

$7.48B

SOBO.TO:

$893.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

GD:

$6.26B

SOBO.TO:

$851.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GD vs. SOBO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SOBO.TO
SOBO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOBO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDSOBO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.99

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

11.40

-4.04

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GD Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GD and SOBO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than SOBO.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and SOBO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDSOBO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.67%

-27.09%

-48.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-12.68%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.37%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.60%

-4.27%

-11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

4.44%

-0.21%

Volatility

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Volatility Comparison

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO) at 7.09%. This indicates that GD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOBO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDSOBO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

7.09%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.78%

14.83%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

20.21%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

44.59%

-24.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.76%

44.59%

-21.83%

Dividends

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Dividend Comparison

GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than SOBO.TO's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.69%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%
SOBO.TO
South Bow Corp
5.18%7.37%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Dynamics Corporation and South Bow Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
13.48B
416.07M
(GD) Total Revenue
(SOBO.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GD vs. SOBO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Dynamics Corporation and South Bow Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
10.5%
22.0%
Portfolio components
GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

SOBO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported a gross profit of 91.48M and revenue of 416.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

SOBO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported an operating income of 91.48M and revenue of 416.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

SOBO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported a net income of 75.74M and revenue of 416.07M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GD and SOBO.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GD and SOBO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer