PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GD vs. CNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GD vs. CNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than CNI's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has outperformed CNI with an annualized return of 12.38%, while CNI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.


GD

1D
0.38%
1M
7.69%
YTD
7.93%
6M
7.67%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
12.38%

CNI

1D
0.60%
1M
7.01%
YTD
21.78%
6M
22.98%
1Y
17.55%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GD vs. CNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
7.93%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
21.78%-0.10%-17.51%7.84%-1.86%13.70%23.66%24.26%-8.49%25.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GD and CNI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 1996

0.37

The correlation between GD and CNI shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GD:

$98.74B

CNI:

$72.80B

EPS

GD:

$15.92

CNI:

CA$7.60

PE Ratio

GD:

22.63

CNI:

21.89

PS Ratio

GD:

1.83

CNI:

5.96

PB Ratio

GD:

3.79

CNI:

4.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

GD:

$53.81B

CNI:

CA$17.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GD:

$7.48B

CNI:

CA$7.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

GD:

$6.26B

CNI:

CA$8.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GD vs. CNI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CNI
CNI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GD vs. CNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDCNIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.13

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

2.08

+5.29

GD vs. CNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GD Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the CNI Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GD and CNI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GD vs. CNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than CNI's maximum drawdown of -46.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and CNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDCNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.67%

-46.66%

-29.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-14.15%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.55%

-29.14%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-29.14%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.63%

-29.15%

-22.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-5.55%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.60%

-9.49%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

7.68%

-3.45%

Volatility

GD vs. CNI - Volatility Comparison

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) at 4.12%. This indicates that GD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDCNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

4.12%

+3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.78%

17.30%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

21.90%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

22.38%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.76%

22.67%

+0.09%

Dividends

GD vs. CNI - Dividend Comparison

GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than CNI's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
2.20%2.58%2.43%1.85%1.41%1.61%1.59%1.79%2.01%2.00%2.23%2.24%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.69%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%

Financials

GD vs. CNI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Dynamics Corporation and Canadian National Railway Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
13.48B
4.39B
(GD) Total Revenue
(CNI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GD values in USD, CNI values in CAD

GD vs. CNI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Dynamics Corporation and Canadian National Railway Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
10.5%
42.8%
Portfolio components
GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

CNI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian National Railway Company reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 4.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

CNI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian National Railway Company reported an operating income of 1.55B and revenue of 4.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

CNI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian National Railway Company reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 4.39B, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GD and CNI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GD has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to CNI (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs CNI's -46.66%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GD and CNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer