GCVIX vs. NQCRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GCVIX (Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GCVIX returned 13.54%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCVIX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.

Performance

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund (GCVIX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCVIX achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GCVIX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 13.54%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.

GCVIX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 27.79%
• 3Y*: 24.68%
• 5Y*: 14.56%
• 10Y*: 13.54%

NQCRX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 37.43%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCVIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund	13.49%	15.34%	35.66%	11.07%	-9.01%	29.14%	1.49%	21.01%	-8.83%	19.44%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	18.43%	22.44%	17.74%	13.76%	-1.07%	25.38%	-0.27%	47.63%	-15.47%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GCVIX and NQCRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006	0.94

The correlation between GCVIX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCVIX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCVIX

GCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
GCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

NQCRX

NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 92
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund (GCVIX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCVIX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	3.01	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	4.13	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	6.32	-2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.59	23.35	-7.76

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCVIX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCVIX drawdown since its inception was -61.49%, which is greater than NQCRX's maximum drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCVIX and NQCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCVIX	NQCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.49%	-57.85%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.69%	-6.07%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.33%	-17.21%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.33%	-17.61%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	-41.84%	+2.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.15%	-9.99%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.63%	+0.22%

Volatility

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund (GCVIX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) have volatilities of 3.99% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCVIX	NQCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	4.14%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.60%	9.92%	-1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	12.77%	-1.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.96%	15.62%	+5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	18.94%	+1.43%

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCVIX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCVIX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

GCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than NQCRX's 6.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCVIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund	6.69%	7.58%	28.86%	3.94%	2.92%	18.84%	1.66%	1.77%	7.31%	1.82%	1.51%	1.89%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	6.17%	7.30%	6.82%	2.22%	4.63%	20.85%	17.95%	26.88%	34.12%	27.42%	10.74%	61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCVIX and NQCRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GCVIX and NQCRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCVIX or NQCRX?

NQCRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to GCVIX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCVIX dropped -61.49% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.