GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L
GCVG.L (SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCVG.L is a Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Refinitiv Qualified Global Convertible (GBP Hedged), while SPY5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GCVG.L returned 19.49%/yr vs 19.29%/yr for SPY5.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCVG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY5.L.
Performance
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GCVG.L is traded in GBP, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCVG.L achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly higher than SPY5.L's 10.71% return.
GCVG.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 18.39%
- 6M
- 21.00%
- 1Y
- 37.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY5.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCVG.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 18.39% | 22.98% | 9.45% | 13.81% | -14.46% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.71% | 9.06% | 27.55% | 20.31% | -4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCVG.L and SPY5.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between GCVG.L and SPY5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Cyclical
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Healthcare
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Industrials
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Financial Services
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Basic Materials
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Utilities
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Communication Services
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Real Estate
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Energy
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Defensive
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank
GCVG.L
SPY5.L
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCVG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.45 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 4.04 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.59 | 13.74 | +10.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCVG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26 | 2.45 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.01 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCVG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum SPY5.L drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCVG.L and SPY5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCVG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -25.97% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -7.19% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.62% | -21.10% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.29% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -3.27% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 2.12% | -0.61% |
Volatility
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that GCVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCVG.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.49% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 8.55% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.35% | 11.90% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 15.36% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 16.47% | -6.54% |
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCVG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCVG.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison
GCVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SPY5.L's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCVG.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCVG.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GCVG.L.
GCVG.L is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while SPY5.L is S&P 500. GCVG.L tracks Refinitiv Qualified Global Convertible (GBP Hedged), while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GCVG.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.
Find the right allocation for GCVG.L and SPY5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer