PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCTS vs. ATOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCTS vs. ATOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GCT Semiconductor Holding Inc (GCTS) and Atomera Incorporated (ATOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCTS achieves a 139.17% return, which is significantly lower than ATOM's 240.72% return.


GCTS

1D
-1.03%
1M
-15.34%
YTD
139.17%
6M
139.17%
1Y
103.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ATOM

1D
-8.84%
1M
-18.51%
YTD
240.72%
6M
233.19%
1Y
53.67%
3Y*
0.40%
5Y*
-21.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCTS vs. ATOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GCTS
GCT Semiconductor Holding Inc
139.17%-48.50%-81.46%
ATOM
Atomera Incorporated
240.72%-80.95%98.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GCTS and ATOM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GCTS:

$189.62M

ATOM:

$265.48M

EPS

GCTS:

-$0.82

ATOM:

-$0.66

PS Ratio

GCTS:

37.82

ATOM:

3.36K

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCTS:

$4.29M

ATOM:

$72.00K

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCTS:

-$958.00K

ATOM:

-$714.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

GCTS:

-$35.77M

ATOM:

-$20.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCTS vs. ATOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCTS
GCTS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GCTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GCTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ATOM
ATOM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ATOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ATOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCTS vs. ATOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCT Semiconductor Holding Inc (GCTS) and Atomera Incorporated (ATOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCTSATOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.86

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

1.46

+2.96

GCTS vs. ATOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the ATOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCTS and ATOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCTS vs. ATOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCTS drawdown since its inception was -97.75%, roughly equal to the maximum ATOM drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCTS and ATOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCTSATOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.75%

-95.72%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.77%

-63.01%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.48%

-83.79%

-9.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.27%

-62.70%

-31.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.50%

36.85%

-13.35%

Volatility

GCTS vs. ATOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GCT Semiconductor Holding Inc (GCTS) is 33.91%, while Atomera Incorporated (ATOM) has a volatility of 41.79%. This indicates that GCTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCTSATOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.91%

41.79%

-7.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.64%

113.73%

-35.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.06%

145.48%

-49.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

204.22%

105.56%

+98.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

204.22%

95.50%

+108.72%

Dividends

GCTS vs. ATOM - Dividend Comparison

Neither GCTS nor ATOM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GCTS vs. ATOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GCT Semiconductor Holding Inc and Atomera Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.92M
11.00K
(GCTS) Total Revenue
(ATOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GCTS and ATOM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATOM has higher volatility (41.79%) compared to GCTS (33.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCTS dropped -97.75% vs ATOM's -95.72%.

GCTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCTS and ATOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer