PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCPYX vs. LSDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund (LSDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCPYX achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than LSDIX's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GCPYX has outperformed LSDIX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while LSDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


GCPYX

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.27%
YTD
5.15%
6M
5.93%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
9.47%

LSDIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.17%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCPYX
Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund
5.15%12.59%18.15%17.59%-11.48%19.28%8.38%16.67%-5.37%12.22%
LSDIX
Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund
-0.07%5.73%3.88%5.75%-8.55%-1.38%7.74%7.64%0.52%2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GCPYX and LSDIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

-0.05

The correlation between GCPYX and LSDIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCPYX vs. LSDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCPYX
GCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LSDIX
LSDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LSDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LSDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund (LSDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCPYXLSDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.24

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.71

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.94

4.90

+13.05

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the LSDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCPYX and LSDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCPYXLSDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.26

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.28

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.69

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.15

-0.42

Drawdowns

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCPYX drawdown since its inception was -25.24%, which is greater than LSDIX's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCPYX and LSDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCPYXLSDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-12.92%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-1.96%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-2.36%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.33%

-12.92%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.24%

-12.92%

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.04%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-1.46%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.70%

+1.32%

Volatility

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Volatility Comparison

Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund (LSDIX) at 0.75%. This indicates that GCPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCPYXLSDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.75%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

1.83%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

2.67%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.28%

3.95%

+8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.46%

3.28%

+9.18%

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCPYX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LSDIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCPYX vs. LSDIX - Dividend Comparison

GCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than LSDIX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCPYX
Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund
0.41%0.44%0.73%0.92%0.96%0.47%0.82%1.07%1.12%1.03%1.15%1.47%
LSDIX
Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund
2.98%3.35%4.24%3.72%2.38%1.75%4.56%3.13%2.69%2.24%2.94%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCPYX and LSDIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCPYX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to LSDIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCPYX dropped -25.24% vs LSDIX's -12.92%.

GCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCPYX and LSDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer