PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCPYX vs. BUIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCPYX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than BUIGX's 6.52% return.


GCPYX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.07%
YTD
5.51%
6M
6.49%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
9.50%

BUIGX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.54%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.05%
1Y
17.73%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCPYX
Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund
5.51%12.59%18.15%17.59%-11.48%19.28%8.38%16.67%-5.37%11.70%
BUIGX
Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund
6.52%11.51%15.54%19.05%-9.88%12.51%10.57%17.71%-2.19%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GCPYX and BUIGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.88

The correlation between GCPYX and BUIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCPYX vs. BUIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCPYX
GCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BUIGX
BUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCPYXBUIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.47

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.57

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.78

18.18

+0.60

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the BUIGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCPYX and BUIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCPYXBUIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.00

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.82

-0.08

Drawdowns

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCPYX drawdown since its inception was -25.24%, which is greater than BUIGX's maximum drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCPYX and BUIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCPYXBUIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-22.01%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-5.12%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-13.94%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.33%

-15.22%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-2.32%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.00%

+1.02%

Volatility

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Volatility Comparison

Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund (GCPYX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) at 1.03%. This indicates that GCPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCPYXBUIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.03%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

7.94%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

9.18%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.28%

11.53%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.46%

11.69%

+0.77%

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCPYX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BUIGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCPYX vs. BUIGX - Dividend Comparison

GCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while BUIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUIGX
Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCPYX
Gateway Equity Call Premium Fund
0.41%0.44%0.73%0.92%0.96%0.47%0.82%1.07%1.12%1.03%1.15%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCPYX and BUIGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCPYX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to BUIGX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCPYX dropped -25.24% vs BUIGX's -22.01%.

GCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCPYX and BUIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer