GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO
GCNS.TO (iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio) and MIX.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GCNS.TO is actively managed, while MIX.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, GCNS.TO returned 13.41% vs 28.31% for MIX.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCNS.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for MIX.TO.
Performance
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCNS.TO achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than MIX.TO's 8.17% return.
GCNS.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 13.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MIX.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GCNS.TO iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 6.84% | 9.72% |
MIX.TO Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF | 8.17% | 25.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCNS.TO and MIX.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GCNS.TO
MIX.TO
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCNS.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.66 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 11.08 | -1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCNS.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.22 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 2.53 | -1.61 |
Drawdowns
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than MIX.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCNS.TO and MIX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCNS.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -10.71% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.81% | -10.71% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -1.38% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 2.56% | -1.12% |
Volatility
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO) is 2.47%, while Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that GCNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCNS.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 4.07% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.59% | 10.51% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.49% | 12.82% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 12.63% | -4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 12.63% | -4.80% |
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCNS.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MIX.TO's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GCNS.TO vs. MIX.TO - Dividend Comparison
GCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than MIX.TO's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCNS.TO iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio | 1.98% | 2.07% | 2.03% | 2.88% | 2.09% | 1.60% | 2.49% |
MIX.TO Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF | 1.57% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCNS.TO and MIX.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIX.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIX.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GCNS.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GCNS.TO and 0.00% for MIX.TO.
Find the right allocation for GCNS.TO and MIX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer