GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L
GCLX.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - GCLX.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD while SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCLX.L returned -3.55%/yr vs 21.51%/yr for SXLE.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCLX.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLE.L.
Performance
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GCLX.L is traded in GBp, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCLX.L achieves a 36.06% return, which is significantly higher than SXLE.L's 31.04% return.
GCLX.L
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 36.06%
- 6M
- 36.43%
- 1Y
- 88.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 31.04%
- 6M
- 28.53%
- 1Y
- 47.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.31%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCLX.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 36.06% | 32.48% | -25.40% | -15.38% | -22.45% | -19.67% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 31.04% | 1.92% | 5.56% | -4.41% | 82.11% | 20.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCLX.L and SXLE.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between GCLX.L and SXLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Utilities
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Energy
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
Consumer Cyclical
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Technology
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Basic Materials
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Financial Services
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
-
Communication Services
GCLX.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Healthcare
GCLX.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Real Estate
GCLX.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
GCLX.L
SXLE.L
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCLX.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.35 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.26 | 2.86 | +5.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.52 | 8.85 | +18.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCLX.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21 | 2.06 | +2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.81 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.40 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCLX.L drawdown since its inception was -69.45%, which is greater than SXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCLX.L and SXLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCLX.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -62.09% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -16.65% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.84% | -23.84% | -29.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.40% | -23.84% | -44.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -9.06% | -20.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -15.52% | -24.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 5.38% | -2.17% |
Volatility
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) have volatilities of 8.47% and 8.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCLX.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 8.66% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 19.47% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.98% | 23.18% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 26.52% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 28.35% | -2.15% |
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCLX.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCLX.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GCLX.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GCLX.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCLX.L.
GCLX.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCLX.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.
Find the right allocation for GCLX.L and SXLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer